I wrote at length about each chapter of this excellent book. It is both a primer on the history of the struggle of native people and also a vision of the future. Estes shows many examples of what white settler colonialism is, how it has been successfully countered, and what a possible future might look like.
Chapter 1: Siege
Chapter 2: Origins
Chapter 3: War
Chapter 4: Flood
Chapter 5: Red Power
Chapter 6: Internationalism
Chapter 7: Liberation
Specter of the Past is part one of the hand of Thrawn Duology which itself is the sequel to the original Thrawn Trilogy and the prequel to the Second Thrawn Trilogy. It’s all about Thrawn even though he’s been dead a decade at this point.
I was very excited to see a lot more of Karrde who has become one of my favorite characters. It’s interesting to see the imperial remnants breaking apart and trying to do different things without ever admitting it. It’s cool to see the Noghri doing well and expanding their horizons. This was a satisfying read which has me feeling excited about the next book, Vision of the Future!
The Last Command was a really wild book. The further along it went, the more clear it became that this series is not canon. 🤣 Leah’s children have different names, some major characters die, some relationships change in different ways than they should for the rebels series.
Keeping all that in mind, it’s a great story. I definitely recommend it.
Ok so I was really frustrated that the story shifted focus towards C’baoth. I found him to be a boring character who wasn’t interesting to read about and explore. I wanted to see Thrawn in action, and you never really do. What was his grand plan? And then at the end, seeing him die in such a boring way, it was so frustrating.
Dark Force Rising was a cool book. I liked the focus on Kardde, who became probably my favorite character in the series so far. He is described as basically what Han might have been in he had not found the rebellion. Like the opposite of Jabba; an underworld crime boss who is honorable and inspires loyalty. This book inspired me to read a lot more about Kardde and queue up the rest of the books about him.
We also got to see a lot of Thrawn’s machinations and secrets explored. There is a lot of build-up like he has some grand plan for the last book. Very excited to see what happens.
It also made me interested to explore more about the high republic era and the history of the dark force. I would definitely recommend this book to any Star Wars fan.
I’ve been very excited for a long time to start this series. Heir to the Empire is the first Thrawn book.
Part of the reason I enjoyed Tarkin and Plagueis so much is that they both focused on the philosophy of power and high-strategy. This topic is essentially the core principle of my life, education, and career. Understanding power is one of my deepest pursuits, but stories like these offer more than concepts. They offer creative situations to consider. This is very helpful for thinking outside the box and developing creative problem solving skills.
All of these books are anti-hero books. They feature flawed characters doing bad things. So the idea with reading them is sort of considering the mindset of people in leadership who are on the other side of the ethical divide, or focused on different missions.
Plagueis was about building the initial Empire while dismantling the democracy of the Republic. There were lots of interesting ideas and concepts to consider related to instigating controlled chaos and subtly shifting the foundations upon which other players are moving, in order to manipulate events from the shadows.
Tarkin led at the peak of Imperial power, and the events of his childhood made him the perfect person to lead the organization at that point, leveraging power to resist change.
Thrawn is a much later strategic genius in the Star Wars universe. He finds himself taking command in a scattered and chaotic immediately-post-imperial landscape. He is working to consolidate power and build an organization from the rubble. Perhaps the most interesting thing about this character is that he is forced to confront limited resources and options, and think creatively to overcome impossible odds.
I loved this first book, and I’m very excited to read the rest!
Alison Bechdel is a lesbian cartoonist who famously gave us the eponymous Bechdel Test.
The Bechdel test, also known as the Bechdel–Wallace test, is a measure of the representation of women in fiction. It asks whether a work features at least two women who talk to each other about something other than a man. The requirement that the two women must be named is sometimes added.
This graphic novel tells the story of her early life and the way she coped with her closeted father’s conflicted life and death. Later in the story, we see her struggle to come to terms with her own sexual identity.
It’s a very interesting and involved narrative. One part in particular really jumped out at me.
“Interstate 80 had just been blasted through the ridge beyond ours. On its way from Christopher Street to the Castro, it passed only four miles from our house…”
Christopher Street is a historically gay street and district in New York City.
Castro is a historically gay street and district in San Francisco.
Interstate 80 goes to neither Christopher Street nor Castro Street. In fact it doesn’t even go to either New York or San Francisco. It starts about 20 miles from Christopher Street and ends about 20 miles from Castro Street.
Still, as a metaphor, Interstate 80 accomplishes the manifest destiny that eluded America’s early imperialists. A person traversing this stretch of asphalt will come within eyesight of the Atlantic Ocean, to within eyesight of the Pacific Ocean. All of America lies in between, and at these two extremes lie places where gays can be gays, especially at the time of this text.
It is therefore ironic that her father killed himself on a highway that could have born him to a place where he could have lived honestly and happily. It’s also a larger irony that he didn’t choose to leave at some point and seek out happiness, rather than living a lie all his life until he chose to kill himself rather than address the problems he faced.
This book is very dense and very wonky. I wouldn’t recommend this to everyone. If you’re interested in power and politics, then this is a good book for you.
The central thesis of the book is two-fold. Klein argues that polarization is different from sorting or categorization because of homophilies. If I know how you feel about abortion, then I know how you feel about guns, despite the fact that these topics are unrelated. Klein argues that this is because those groups are aligned together. This means that whenever discussion is happening, anything that touches one topic touches all aligned topics; we can’t talk about abortion without also implicitly talking about guns.
Polarization, Klein argues, is the magnification effect that happens when groups are aligned on different issues. If I am debating abortion, then the emotion behind my argument also includes my emotion about guns and everything else, because our culture only exists at two ends of a spectrum with nothing in between.
Klein shows evidence for the escalation of these effects over the course of the last century, and concludes that there is no way to stop this and it’s going to keep getting worse.
This brings up Alinsky in my mind. His Rules For Radicals seem to reflect both the causes and the effects of polarization. I think it might be interesting to launch a discussion group/book club which reads both this book and Alinsky’s book in order to discuss what it means about how we should talk to each other and discuss topics of interest. The pursuit of an answer to this question will come to define much of the discourse over the next generation, whether or not people are aware of these topics.
This is easily one of my favorite books. This was my first time reading it, and I found that I had to take breaks to reflect, and often reread chapters before moving on. Very excellent work by Gibson. I can see the way his thoughts moved in the direction of Neuromancer towards the end and then led into that series.
Burning Chrome is an anthology of short science fiction stories, some of which are set in the same universe and some of which are not. One of the stories is set inside a future soviet space program. One is about The Edge which figures heavily in Count Zero. Yet another is set in cyberspace and has had a dramatic effect on the way I imagine cyberspace and cyberpunk more broadly.
Anyone who likes science fiction should read this book. Anyone who loves cyberpunk MUST read this book. 10/10
In the 1970s, Michel Foucault was working on something unrelated and discovered an important memoir. Herculine Barbin had lived a short and noteworthy life as an intersex and transgender person in the mid-1800s. Foucault translated and published the memoir. It spread far and wide and impacted many people around the world.
Jeffrey Eugenides was one of the people it impacted. He says it was a main inspiration for the book Middlesex, though he believed the memoir evaded discussion about the anatomy and emotions of intersex people. He said in an interview in 3AM Magazine that he intended Middlesex to be “the story [he] wasn’t getting from the memoir.”
Middlesex is a very strange story to read. I think that’s the idea. It’s a psychedelic and jarring journey back and forth through time. It tries to accomplish the personal story of a fictional intersex person struggling to discover what it means to be intersex and how to navigate life from that perspective.
Initially I was a little uncertain about reading the story of an intersex person which was written by someone who is not intersex, transgender, or even queer. But this was required reading for an LGBT Literature class so I soldiered through it. It has inspired me to put the Herculine memoir on my reading list at some point when I have time.
As a sociologist, this was an interesting read. This book explores the issue of systemic sexism from a philosophical perspective rather than a sociological perspective. It also articulates a normative ethical framework for considering the issue, and the implications for what duty we have in response. This is exactly the topic I most wanted to explore and learn about at SFSU.
Imagine the question, “Why is it wrong to sexually harass women?” It’s very difficult to answer this question logically, because most logical frameworks we have today include sexism, being created by proudly sexist religions or cultures in the past. Logic fails the task of answering the question from most historical perspectives. Even the perspectives that make the attempt fall short.
Manne argues that down-moves (or moves that subjugate) are bad because they steal agency from subjects and force them to be objects instead of subjects. This is her fundamental claim.
The book assumes from feminism the claim that systemic sexism exists as an aggregation of microaggressions. These microaggressions are necessarily misogynistic, having the form of “down-girl” moves. These are acts which subjugate women on the basis of gender. Manne calls this argument the ameliorative approach, because it implies that the duty is not to discuss statistics about inequality, but to directly confront misogyny. Rather than talking about the social construction of inequality, we can focus on ameliorating acts that subjugate women.
I really like this argument because it implies a larger issue for all systems of oppression. If there are down-girl moves then there are down-black moves and down-gay moves. It’s easy to see how Manne’s ameliorative approach shifts the focus from measuring and discussing disparate impact to instead finding and ameliorating the root cause of that disparate impact.
This has really changed the way I think about budgeting the energy I spend working on these issues.