USP 515 Session 2 Notes
August 27, 2020
Central Concepts
- What do you think of when you hear the term “environmental justice”?
    - Disparate impact of environmental decisions
        - Alameda county and 580 freight ban
            - Racial gap in life expectancy and respiratory disorder
 
 
- Alameda county and 580 freight ban
            
- Role of research in demonstrating impact and causes
- Bring people into conversation about environments
- Humans and the environment coinciding
- Trying to create an equitable, equal playing field for everyone
        - Access to outdoor spaces
 
 
- Disparate impact of environmental decisions
        
- What do you think the concept “environmental justice” implies and is aiming for?
    - Implies that there is a systemic problem
- Calls attention to differential impacts
- Goal-oriented concept
- Rejects these paradigms
        - Environmental injustice
- Environmental racism
- Mainstream environmental movement -
 
 
- How does environmental justice relate to the planning of the urban environment and to people’s everyday lives? -
Notes
- The professor presented a deductive argument for her perspective of environmental justice which features anthroprocentrism as a descriptive and absolute fact about the entire movement of environmental justice rather than a “most” or “some” argument.
    - Several students offered counterexamples to reject the”all” argument, since there are many examples which disagree such as native traditions. The professor rejected these critiques of her position.
 
- Environmental justice features redress as a core duty.
    - Reparations for historical injustices